![]() |
![]() |
||
|
![]() |
Here's another set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) about doing design of experiments (DOE), plus alerts to timely information and free software updates. If you missed the previous DOE FAQ Alert, please click on the links at the bottom of this page. If you have a question that needs answering, click the Search tab and enter the key words. This finds not only answers from previous Alerts, but also other documents posted to the Stat-Ease web site. Feel free to forward this newsletter to your colleagues. They can subscribe by going to http://www.statease.com/doealertreg.html. If this newsletter prompts you to ask your own questions about DOE, please address them via mail to:StatHelp@StatEase.com. Here's an appetizer to get this Alert off to a good start: See http://statsmadeeasy.net for an "Experi-Mento" video demonstrating an explosive reaction that requires only candy and cola. To view this you need Quicktime and a high-speed internet connection — give it a few moments to load. In any case, get to the source of this experiment at http://www.eepybird.com/ and consider trying it at your home, or better yet, outdoors! Here's what I cover in the body text of this DOE FAQ Alert (topics that delve into statistical detail are designated "Expert"): 1. FAQ: Requirements for lack-of-fit test PS. Quote for the month: How the famous author Jane Austen generated food for her fascinating writing. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1. FAQ: Requirements for lack-of-fit test -----Original Question----- Answer (from Stat-Ease Consultant Shari Kraber): "Let me clarify. In order to do a lack-of-fit test, there are two things required: 1. The design must include some replicated points for estimating pure error. 2. "Extra" unique design points, beyond the minimum needed for the model, must be included. Design-Expert calls these points "lack of fit." It positions them as far away from other points as possible using a distance-based criterion. A good predictive model will fit the D-optimally selected and the lack-of-fit points equally well. The lack-of-fit test compares the difference between the actual and predicted values to the pure error between the replicates. Ideally you will find any lack of fit to be statistically insignificant. The recently-released version 7 of Design-Expert (DX7) features a 3D bar graph* that displays the observed response values above and below the fitted surface. We have found this to be a great way to visualize the model-fit. *PS: See this graph on the last page of the DX7 tutorial posted
at http://www.statease.com/x70ug/DX7-02C-Gen2Factorial-P1.pdf. (Learn more about lack of fit and other DOE basics by attending the three-day computer-intensive workshop "Experiment Design Made Easy." See http://www.statease.com/clas_edme.html for a course description. Link from this page to the course outline and schedule. Then, if you like, enroll online.) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2. Info alert: A colorful application
for mixture design I should write "colourful" per the preference of Dr. Timothy Ebert. He is an entomologist and a practicing potter with an interest in how science can enhance art. This inspired Tim to apply mixture design for optimal formulation of colors for a ceramic glaze. His work was published under the title "Designing Glaze Colours" in issue 21 of Ceramics Technical journal (http://www.ceramicart.com.au/home/index.html), pages 30-37. Tim's version of this publication can be seen at http://www.statease.com/pubs/glazecolours.pdf. (Learn more about design and analysis of mixture experiments by attending the three-day computer-intensive workshop "Mixture Design for Optimal Formulations." For a course description, click http://www.statease.com/clas_mix.html and link from there to our schedule of public presentations and online enrollment.) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 3. Reader response: Comments on Cornell's ideas on how to assess the impact of blocking -----Original Question----- I'm motivated to write by John Cornell's comments on blocking.* Like John, I emphasize that every experiment suggests how to improve future experiments. I also find it very useful to evaluate whether to continue using the same types of blocks. I don't use a formal test, however. There is a useful addendum to the Cochran and Cox expression for the efficiency of blocking. That is: Eff(RCBD to CRD) > 1 if and only if F (=MSBlk/MSErr) > 1 The formal p-value is less useful than the estimated F statistic. In fact, insisting on a 'significant' block effect is too restrictive." *See #4 at http://www.statease.com/news/faqalert6-06.html. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~4. Unsolicited testimonial: "Most practical stat books ...
ever" -----Original Comments----- Answer: My co-author Pat Whitcomb and I are grateful for these complimentary comments and others of its kind. Many have asked that we move on to mixture design. We agree wholeheartedly that this would be helpful for those who do not need something as thorough as the texts by Cornell and Smith. However, our first task is to update "DOE Simplified" — a second edition of which is now well underway. (For books on DOE, see http://www.statease.com/prodbook.html. Click on the picture of any book for detail on its content. Then purchase it directly via e-commerce.) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 5. Events alert: Stat-Ease seen coast to coast this Summer I will be on the USA East Coast on July 30 to explain how Stat-Ease software facilitates "Design and Optimization of Growth Medium." This is the title of a preconference workshop presented for the 2006 Annual Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology Meeting in Baltimore, MD. For details, see #3 at http://www.simhq.org/meetings/06_ann_mtg_workshops.aspx. Stat-Ease will make an appearance on the West Coast at the Joint Statistical Meetings (JSM) of the American Statistical Association (ASA) and several other professional societies http://www.amstat.org/meetings/JSM/2006/ next month in Seattle, WA. Consultant Wayne Adams will chair a roundtable discussion on "Graphical & Numerical Approaches to Selecting Effects in Two-Level Factorial Models" (http://tinyurl.com/ne9ut ) over lunch on Tuesday August 8. It is sponsored by the Section on Quality and Productivity (Q&P). Stat-Ease will exhibit its software at Booth 318 on Sunday, August 6th through Wednesday the 9th. Click http://www.statease.com/events.html for a list of appearances by Stat-Ease professionals. We hope to see you sometime in the near future! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 6. Workshop alert: See when and where to learn about DOE See http://www.statease.com/clas_pub.html for schedule and site information on all Stat-Ease workshops open to the public. To enroll, click the "register online" link on our web site or call Stat-Ease at 1.612.378.9449. If spots remain available, bring along several colleagues and take advantage of quantity discounts in tuition, or consider bringing in an expert from Stat-Ease to teach a private class at your site. Call us to get a quote. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I hope you learned something from this
issue. Address your general questions and comments to me at: Mark@StatEase.com.
Sincerely, Mark Mark J. Anderson, PE, CQE PS. Quote for the
month — How the famous author Jane Austen generated food
for her fascinating writing: Acknowledgements to contributors: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Interested
in previous FAQ DOE Alert e-mail newsletters? Click here to add your name to the DOE
FAQ Alert newsletter list server.
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Stat-Ease, Inc.
2021 E. Hennepin Avenue, Ste 480
Minneapolis, MN 55413-2726
e-mail: info@statease.com
p: 612.378.9449, f: 612.378.2152